Justice Yusuf Halilu setting aside the order said that the EFCC had surpressed facts which misled the court into earlier granting the application, thereby, making the detention illegal.

Justice Halilu held that the Court was not aware of all the facts presented by the applicant and which the EFCC could not deny.

“Having considered all the facts before the court , it is clear that the commission suppressed facts to mislead the court.

“If indeed there is a fresh petition against the applicant, and a pending matter is before the Federal High Court, the respondent need not a remand order, but to apply to amend the charge in which it is prosecuting the applicant.

“By coming for a remand order , the respondent had come to tamper with the sacred right of the applicant, which he enjoys. I wonder

“On this note, I hereby set aside the earlier remand order and order the immediate release

Mr Ahmed Raji SAN  Ayeni’s counsel had approached the court seeking his release from the EFCC custody.

The anti-graft agency had last week approached the Court through an ex-parte application seeking a 14-day remand order of Ayeni.

The EFCC had premised the request for a remand on a need to investigate a  petition submitted by the Office of the Vice President in respect of his alleged roles as the Chairman of the defunct Skye Bank.

The court then granted the said ex-parte application.

In his submissions, Raji argued that the application is challenging the jurisdiction of the court and the action of the Commission.

He informed the court of a pending suit before the Federal High Court against the applicant on the same subject matter and that the trial judge at the Federal High Court,  Justice Nnamdi Dimgba had in the particular case admitted him to bail.

He added that the bail condition had since been perfected

Raji added that the detention of the applicant was a breach of his fundamental human right as he went to the Commission by himself on an invitation.

He further submitted that the anti-graft agency purportedly admitted the applicant to administration bail on non -realizable terms which amount to “giving bail with one hand, and collecting it back with the other hand”.

Raji argued that the subject matter for which the applicant was detained centred around Skye bank issue which is already before the Federal High  Court.

He however prayed the court to set aside the remand order and release the applicant.

In his response, respondent counsel, Mr A.I Audu opposed to the application on the ground that the subject matter of which the applicant is being detained was fresh, quite different from that of the matter before the Federal High Court.

He added that asides the petition submitted by the Office of the Vice President, the acting Chairman of the Commission also received a petition against the applicant from a Non-Governmental Organization.

He, however, added that the applicant was invited based on the petition that he received about N8 billion from CBN to buy over Union Homes.

Audu further submitted that the applicant has been giving useful information to the Commission but fell ill along the way and he was consequently taken to the hospital.

He added, it is the illness of the applicant that prompted the Commission to seek an order to further remand him to complete the investigation.

NAN